9-5 why Dolly is good for Broadway…

April 29, 2009 • No Comments

New York Magazine’s just did a great profile on Dolly Parton (Dolly or Bust).  It really gets to the heart of what a wonderful artist, person and businesswoman she is.  Reading it gives you a tiny peek into Dolly’s world.  Now, in all fairness, I am a huge Dolly Parton fan, I have been since I was little.  When they announced 9-5, I thought it was a brilliant idea.  Fun movie, had a great story even though it is dated, and Dolly is by far one of the greatest songwriters ever and knows how to tell a story in a song. 

Now, when I saw the show, I had the time of my life – I laughed so hard I cried.  The show was true to the movie while poking a little fun at it.  I loved the cast and the music (again between Brian and I we probably own everything she has recorded).  I sent out tweets and status updates declaring what a great time the show was.

Obviously the new musical competition is a tough category this year and the reviews won’t be out until Friday, I have to say, I think Dolly coming to Broadway is a really good thing for two reasons:  

First and foremost, I think through the press push she is doing this week and the cast album she will introduce a lot of people to musical theatre.  

Second, in a landscape filled with American Idols contestants it is good to see a mentor’s work hit to boards (with original songs).  Elton John coming to Broadway had that same kind of thrill – and he has stayed (and it Dolly’s biggest competition this year, although she wrote the music AND the lyrics). 

So welcome to Broadway, Dolly.  Happy Opening and I hope you are here for a good long time!

Sookie: the theater dog

I wrote this today for myself, but even though it is personal I think a lot of theatre folks can relate, so I guess I will go ahead and post it.

One of the great thing about most theatre people is that they are animal people.  Almost everyone I know has a cat or dog that takes the career journey with them.  It is common for dogs to be backstage in the dressing rooms, in the box office, or in the administrative offices of many theatres – many theatres have cats (hey, there is a mice issue).  I have always thought that having animals around offices made for a better work environment.  Thank goodness everywhere I have ever worked has not only allowed but encouraged this.  As anyone who knows me (or reads the blog and sees the family photos on the left), I am a huge animal lover.

At the Arts Council job I had after grad school, my cocker-lab mix Elle travelled with me to the office and almost all of my off-campus outreach programs.  She was more popular in the public housing units and Fort Bragg in Fayetteville, NC than I ever was.  She was quickly joined by General the tea-cup Chihuahua.   When I moved to New York, they both occasionally joined me at MCC Theater or at the Vineyard.  People would always be shocked to find Elle asleep under my desk and General asleep in a tote bag.  I went to many restaurants with little General asleep in that bag.  When General passed at the age of 17+, Elle and our kitty Emmie were alone for a bit until Sookie joined the family.  Sookie’s first day in New York was spent in the Signature Theatre Company’s offices, where she spent a lot of the next four years. 

She was more of a theatre dog than any that came before her or those who arrived after.  Sookie went to the office regularly where she tortured Chris our Production Manager by barking at him constantly – he barked back.  She delighted in crawling up on the couch on with Adam and insisting he pet her despite the fact that he was allergic to her. She knew exactly where Jim kept treats hidden in his cabinet for her and would wait impatiently until the door opened.  She sat through most dress rehearsals on my lap in full attention watching the show, completely quiet except for two notable instances – during The Regard Evening at the end of Bill Irwin’s big juggling sequence Sookie let go with a loud round of barking applause and during the The Baltimore Waltz when Jeremy Webb twisted the neck of the stuffed rabbit cherished by the lead character, Sookie almost leapt onto the stage in a fit of anger.  I swear to this day that she watched and understood most of the shows. One night we lost electricity a few minutes into the first act of a performance, Sookie was in the box office and while I ran around trying to fix the problem a couple of audience members played with her.  When we finally cancelled the show, Sookie was in my arms, and everyone joked that I was holding her on purpose since no one would complain with her little sweet eyes staring up at them (they were right).

When we came to Connecticut, our dear kitten Squeakers had passed at the age of two from breast cancer and Emmie was distraught and confused by the move, so Sookie didn’t go to the office as often and some new puppies came into the family who took turns visiting at the Playhouse, but none developed the taste for watching shows like Sookie. 

This morning Sookie unexpectedly passed at the early age of 10.  Thank you to all of my friends who called, emailed and sent Facebook messages as soon as they heard.  We really appreciate it.

I am sure she has joined Elle, General, Squeakers and a host of other theatre dogs and cats who have kept an endless number of actors, designers, stage managers, producers, directors, etc. company during shows. 

Our dear little Sookie – Brian, Emmie, Socks, Tipper, Shea, Roo and I will miss you terribly. In addition to an endless supply of treats, a giant yard to run around in, wherever you are, I hope you get to take in a show or two every once in a while.

A bright light off-Broadway: ROOMS

The other night I had the luck of taking in ROOMS, a new musical off-Broadway.  I don’t write reviews, but when I see something that makes me happy that I spent the night in the theatre, I want to make note of it.   Sure the story was familiar, but the performances were wonderful and the music was fun.  It is just the kind of show that off-Broadway needs (and used to jam-packed with).  The design elements were perfect in the fact that they were sparse, meaningful and appropriate.  There was a band – not just a piano.  It didn’t have a gimmick, in fact in many ways it was the most traditional show I had seen in a while – and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. 

I left the show a bit more hopeful for commercial off-Broadway and with a bounce in my step.  New work was making it to the stage, talented actors were working and there were people in the audience – I call that a good day.  

If you wanna win the Bonnet put some bling on it…oh, oh, oh!

April 28, 2009 • No Comments

A little while back I wrote a post about Extreme Fundraising that was being done for charities and I wondered what it would look like for the arts.  I noted how the causes were usually very personal and that the people involved put themselves through some sort of rigorous event.  Today I was reminded that theatre actually does have a form of extreme fundraising that is done during certain times of the year and takes a Herculean effort – it is the wonderful work done for Broadway Cares – Equity Fights Aids.

In a mere 6 weeks, through curtain speeches the theatre community raised $3,402,147.  That’s right almost 3 and a half million raised by actors and stage managers, often aided by the crews, ushers, and other working on a show through curtain speeches (and ticket sales to the Easter Bonnet performance).

The Easter Bonnet is one of many events held throughout the season:

The Easter Bonnet Competition features a parade of bonnets hand-crafted by the cast and crews of dozens of participating productions which are presented in song, dance and comedic sketches. A "must-see" for the Broadway fan, the show is always a highlight of the spring season, with moments both hilarious and heartfelt.

This annual spring event is the culmination of an intensive six-week fundraising effort by the companies of Broadway, Off-Broadway and national touring productions.

Curtain speeches, sales of autographed posters and programs, auctions and cabaret performances are just some of the activities that enable these companies to bring in generous contributions from audiences on Broadway and across the country.

Honors are awarded to the companies that raise the largest amounts of money on behalf of BC/EFA during the fundraising drive. Companies offering the best designs and presentations of bonnets are also recognized.

Since 1987, 22 editions of The Easter Bonnet Competition have raised over $35 million for BC/EFA which, in turn, has supported programs at The Actors Fund including The AIDS Initiative, The Phyllis Newman Women’s Health Initiative, as well as over 400 AIDS and family service organizations across the country.

If that isn’t extreme fundraising – I don’t know what is!

And for those of you who weren’t at the show, you missed a fun afternoon.  Some of my favorite highlights included:

33 Variations “volunteer” [read be there or supposedly Jane will kill you] rehearsal skit – complete with Jane Fonda leading the cast in an aerobics workout.

Avenue Q – Puppet Rod vs. Howie Michael Smith singing a re-written “You’re nothing without me” from City of Angels (one of my all time favorite show tunes), only to be interrupted by the adorable Johnny Tartaglia (full disclosure, I was the GM on the original off-Broadway production and Johnny is one of the nicest, cutest most lovable people I have ever met or worked with). 

Billy Elliott – the young ballerinas in the cast being joined by 105 year old Ziegfeld Follies dancer Doris Eaton Travis).

Tovah Feldshuh and Joan Allen (two of many masters of ceremonies) who were beyond funny.

The dashing Jeremy Irons being charming and witty during the final awards – someone should be booking him now to host a gala.  His self-effacing humor was brilliant. 

If you weren’t there you missed a wonderfully fun afternoon – even if there were a lot of Liza references and almost every skit parodied Patty LuPone’s on-stage rant.  If you were at today (or yesterday), the title of the blog makes perfect sense…

(Fine – for those who weren’t there the Bonnet dancers did their own version of Beyonce’s hit – All the Singles Ladies, after declaring Seth Rudetsky Broadway’s Sasha Fierce.)

Michael Wilson, Hartford Stage

Michael Wilson knows what he likes – AMERICAN THEATRE magazine.

Frank Rizzo interviews Hartford Stage’s Michael Wilson, who is one of the most interesting artistic directors out there.

Wilson on undertaking the nine play Horton Foote Orphans Cycle: “It screws courage to purpose in the not-for-profit, professional theatre to take on an endeavor such as this. It clarifies why we are vital and necessary.”

Couldn’t agree with him more.

Bring it to scale

Bridgespan has released a new report about bringing organizations to scale.   Organization replication and scale is something we tend to forget about when it comes to the arts.   But isn’t the first question we should ask – what is the “right-size” for an organization to accomplish its mission?

The Bridgespan report notes some key challenges for nonprofits in determining and fulfilling scale:

  1. Distinguishing promising programs from proven ones is complicated, costly and essential.  Many social service organizations have little if any evidence of their programs’ efficacy. This doesn’t mean that they aren’t producing results. But it does mean we cannot say for certain that they do.
  2. Scaling requires rethinking traditional patterns of funding. If we want to make a pervasive impact on our nation’s most difficult problems, we are talking about supporting fewer organizations with larger sums of money. Concentrating resources on a few organizations is rarely how money flows today.

Last summer at Harvard Business School’s Strategic Perspectives for Nonprofit Managers, we spent a lot of time talking about scale.  This was the first time I really fully explored the concept in terms of the arts and in particular theatre.  In the post, I pointed out four strategies in terms of scale.

1. Get support for fixed costs (and maybe semi-variable costs), and have variable (and maybe or semi-variable) costs covered by earned income.
2. Franchise.
3. Engage in partnerships (or even possibly mergers).
4. Create a subsidiary of a commercial business.

Shouldn’t successful organizations and programs be replicated? What would bringing it to scale mean for theatre? Can we “franchise?” Aren’t co-productions, touring, or moving a show be a type of franchising in the theatre?  Certainly education programs are replicated – it happens naturally more often than not without a strategic plan, but why not plan to replicate and take certain ideas for programming to scale.  In a way the NEA Big Read program is doing exactly that.

When talking about funding models and whether theatre’s should be saved, if we can talk replication, we have to take mergers under consideration.  For some reason in the arts, mergers are often interpreted as failures.  But consolidation, restructuring, and resource-sharing can be VERY effective for theatre organizations and individual productions, so why not out-right mergers?  Certainly in terms of scale it may make sense for organizations and the community.

We certainly are seeing a form of mergers in co-productions and new play development.   Adrian Ellis wrote in the Art Newspaper that this would be one of the three ways to compensate for the losses in philanthropic, endowment and visitor incomes for museums, “what museums accept they cannot do alone, they will explore doing together more thoroughly and earnestly than in the past: collection sharing, joint acquisitions, pooling conservation resources, and pooling curatorial appointments.”

Without question determining scale is difficult and requires significant examination, but it seems to be an essential step which we don’t take enough time to address and plan.

If you are reading this post via Facebook Notes, please click-thru to Off Stage Right and be counted (and keep reading other posts).

  • Ongoing research, evaluation and performance measurement are imperative as an organization scales. Put simply, there is no other way to ensure that even a well-funded program with proven outcomes will be expanded and sustained. A good idea absent its execution is in fact not a good idea at all.
  • Scaling a nonprofit’s programs without investing in its capacity is a recipe for failure. Building organizational and human capacity – putting in place the strategy, systems and, above all else, the right people in the right jobs to convert money into results – is as important a factor in bringing a program successfully to scale as the money itself.
  • Key Issues facing the nonprofit theatre industry (a top ten list)

    April 27, 2009 • No Comments

    Issue One: The business model is broken (if it ever worked).   We need a new definition of fiscal health and sustainability based on individual organizations needs.

    Theaters across the US are acknowledging that the traditional nonprofit theatre model is broken (60% earned/40% contributed). For many structural deficits have become the norm rather than the exception.

    Other Earned Income resources can be explored but must not pull the theatre off mission.  Enhancement income can be raised from aggressive new play development and active exploration within the industry. Although this is a somewhat unpredictable source of income when done under the right circumstances it can be very helpful in offsetting expenses.  When done for the wrong reasons (read – for the money) it can be devastating.  Co-Productions are another performance related income stream. Similar to enhancement income, the partnership is as important as the income source. Many Education Programs generate significant revenue through participant fees, vendor agreements with academic institutions, or corporate training programs. Real estate acquisition and utilization can be a revenue source for many organizations.

    Rising Production costs must be reasonably contained, however, eventually many theatres might have to go through a certain amount of correction on their production expenses if they are “living beyond their means.”  Programming, fund-raising and administrative needs of companies need to be assessed regularly.

    Theatres need to address contributed revenue across the board – annual campaigns, specialized campaigns, and reserves/endowment.  Alternatives to traditional endowments will need to be explored.  Working capital must be addressed.

    We must assess our governance structures and make sure there is balance between board, artistic and managing leadership.  Too often healthy discussions become tyrannical demands by one or two of the partners.

    Issue Two: Many of our mission statements have become interchangeable.

    Writing missions by committee has watered down many theatres’ missions.  Consensus has become a compromise to mediocrity.  Organizational values are sometimes difficult to identify and in a few cases have been lost to the whim of leadership changes and egos.  We must return to missions that address a need.  Why do we have mission statements in the first place? We need a purpose.  We have to have an identity right? A uniqueness? A reason our community needs us? We have to use our resources and capabilities to fill some social need.  We need goals to measure our impact against!

    Issue Three:  We have lost our relevancy within our communities.

    The first two issues have created the most challenging and threatening issue of all.  Several organizations have veered away from their original mission and become increasingly irrelevant.  Theatre has become about making the safe choice.  We shy away from artistic risks over concerns for finances – just when we should be taking the greatest risks with our work.  We aren’t spending enough time getting to know our constituencies so aren’t picking work that matters to them. We must live up to the responsibilities we have to our community.

    Issue Four: We aren’t investing enough in new kinds of theatre – the evolution of the form.

    Theatre has a bad tendency of being behind the times, we must explore how we use new technologies, environmental theatre and challenge the definition of the theatre or new forms will evolve without us.

    Issue Five: We should partner more often with other arts organizations or social service organizations.

    We must identify mutually beneficial partnerships and eliminate those that drain resources.  Natural partnerships have formed with other theatres and some arts organizations, but we must actively pursue new bonds and relationships that allow us to share resources and fund our expenses.

    Issue Six: We don’t do enough for families.

    As members of a community, we must do more for families.  In a world where group experiences are becoming more and more virtual we must provide programming that  brings families together under our roof to experience live storytelling.  We must make theatre-goers.  If you haven’t experienced something you will never miss it.  We need to provide flexible services and scheduling to parents as well as provide the tools with which to explore theatre together with their children.  We need to have programming that reaches audiences of all ages focusing on the major transition periods.

    Issue Seven: We need to make theater more accessible.

    Programs that lower ticket prices must be created so that more people can see shows.  We have marginalized much of the theatre-going experience to the affluent.  Of course not all programming will be accessible to everyone (that is unfortunately inherent in the arts structure).  But we have reached a point of imbalance.  A correction is essential to remain relevant, to serve most missions, and to keep theatre alive.

    Issue Eight: We need to build theater’s Audience Base.

    We must create participatory experiences beyond productions.  Education programs, outreach programs, audience development programs – whatever you want to call them, must be at the center of the organization along with productions.  We cannot afford for them to remain or become satellites to production.  When all of the information in the world is available in a few keystrokes in a google search, we must feed the desire for deeper, more qualitative, more educational experiences. We have to listen to our audiences, create a dialogue, and create forums for ideas to be expressed.  We have to work as diligently on the relationship with the audience as we work on producing the work.  We must speak their language and use their communication tools.

    Issue Nine: We need to build theater’s Donor Base.

    We must work with the entire nonprofit community to stop complete marginalization of the arts.  We must finally create a multi-layer argument regarding the value of the arts.  We must stop the competition and aggression towards other arts organizations.  Again, we must listen to our donors and create loyalty and generosity that is based on something more than a rewards system for patrons.

    Issues Ten: We must empower and invest in our staffs.

    Without committed and seasoned staffs we will not achieve any of our goals. We need the staffs of organizations to drive programming and ALL activities of the of the organization in partnership with the board to achieve appropriate growth, long-term strategic goals and the necessary fund-raising to sustain the organization.  We need to invest in continuing education for our staffs.  We must break the cycle of short-term employment and increase staff retention.

    As with any list about an entire industry, of course there are folks working on these issues.   Please share what you are doing!  Learning from one another and working together is the only way to address these issues industry-wide!

    Recent news worth reading!

    April 26, 2009 • No Comments

    Someone asked me for a list of the articles that I either tweeted about or posted to Facebook. So I thought on Sunday nights, I would send out the links of things that caught my eye during the week. Let me know if you found something I should read! If you are on Twitter please follow me: JodiSC.

    Corporate philanthropy at risk amid recession http://www.abc.net.au/news/

    WMA and Endeavor are one. http://u.nu/6wk

    http://u.nu/76j America’s most promising Social Entrepreneurs – Business Week

    Fewer Donations, Shrinking Assets Force Nonprofits to Get Fiscally Creative http://bit.ly/5mb6H

    More Family Foundations Transferring Assets to Donor-Advised Funds http://bit.ly/PhjUG

    NPR For Downsized Actors, Performance Anxiety Looms http://tinyurl.com/da529s

    WSJ America’s Newest Profession: Bloggers for Hire http://tinyurl.com/de99vh

    WNYC Revives Radio Drama http://viigo.im/nB4

    Race an Issue in Wilson Play, and in Its Production NY TIMES http://tinyurl.com/dg6sv5

    Nonprofits urged to be more open http://viigo.im/mXb

    White House Social Innovation Office to Have Three Goals http://tinyurl.com/dkodn6

    Nonprofits strained to breaking point by recession http://viigo.im/mWW

    Board Eats Endowment, Gloom Deepens at City Opera: Commentary http://tinyurl.com/cz6btn BLOOMBERG

    Artists vs. Blight – WSJ – will Cleveland be the next artistic center, can artists save an entire city? http://tinyurl.com/dlw5w6

    Staff cuts loom for nonprofit groups – Philanthropy Journal http://viigo.im/lDE

    Off B-way packs them in (but it’s not enough for most to make up contributed losses) CRAINS NY http://tinyurl.com/c7ydq2

    How to Sell a Nanny, a Mermaid and a Lion NY TIMES http://tinyurl.com/c9w7an

    City Opera Taps Into Endowment NY TIMES http://tinyurl.com/cw427k

    More nonprofits engage in mergers for survival BOSTON GLOBE http://tinyurl.com/cqaepu

    Hiring freeze spreads – VARIETY http://tinyurl.com/damkmu

    List of Bloggers who attended the first Theater Bloggers Social

    April 25, 2009 • No Comments

    Will be adding these to their own special blog roll but here they are:

    www.creatingtheater.com

    www.pataphysicalscience.blogspot.com

    www.me2ism.blogspot.com

    www.ccaggiano.typepad.com

    www.zackcalhoon.blogspot.com

    www.off-stage-right.com

    www.corinescorner.com

    www.theatreaficionado.blogspot.com

    www.theproducersperspective.com

    www.ryanjdavis.blogspot.com

    www.JeremysGreenRoom.com

    www.thedjf.blogspot.com

    www.broadwaybullet.com

    www.onenycstagehand.blogspot.com

    www.lezbehonest.tumblr.com

    www.stagebuzz.com

    www.clydefitch.com

    www.justshowstogoyou.com

    www.broadwaystars.com

    www.ushernonsense.com

    www.stagerush.blogspot.com

    www.thatsoundscool.blogspot.com

    www.sarahbsadventures.blogspot.com

    www.oneproducerinthecity.com

    www.adaumbellesquest.com

    www.aislesay.com

    www.tynansanger.com

    www.BroadwayAbridged.com

    www.kimweild.com

    Audience and Donor Types – are you a tag-a-long or loyalist?

     

    Whether you are talking about donor or audience members there are some general types – motivations – that apply (as with all things in life). It is important for every show or in the case of institutions, every season and community, to be analyzed to see which of these types may be predisposed to attending a performance or making a donation.

     

    Type: Preview Chasers (always try to attend prior to a shows opening)

     

    1. Subtype: Those looking for a cheap ticket. This is pretty self explanatory. Lots or papering services customers here.
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking to be the first one in their social group to see a show. This group is a bit savvier and tends to attend a show late in previews – often targeting the press nights. These group contains the a lot of theater aficionados – they want to express their thoughts on a show rather than having their opinions shaped by reviews. They see most of what plays on and off Broadway. They are inclined to purchase memberships or subscriptions to nonprofits. This group has sub-subtypes – new plays, musicals and classics. This is probably one of the smallest groups but the most cherished for word of mouth. Most of the theatrical blogger movement comes from this group.
    4.  

    5. Subtype: Those looking for a train wreck. There are people who simply want to see if something will go wrong, usually on a large musical or star studded straight play. I know plenty of people who rushed to see if Katie Holmes would be able to project enough to fill a theatre, let alone create a character on stage. This group is particularly happy when a whole show gets branded a train wreck – Dance with the Vampires. They spend a lot of time on sites like www.allthatchat.com. Sad to say that this group has a lot of (bitter) industry members in it.

     

    Type: Review Chasers (purchase based on good reviews from critic(s) they trust – most often, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.)

       

    1. Subtype: Those looking only for Raves in major periodicals. No mixed reviews for them. These folks show by the adjective or quote ad. They are looking for only the hot shows. They may subscribe to a nonprofit company that has a strong streak of successful shows – to make sure they get in with good seats, but without a good review they simply let the tickets go to deadwood. This group also has sub-subtypes for Bway, off-Bway, off-off, cabaret, etc.
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking for easy access. This group more or less lets the show find them. They don’t seek out the show, but they sample one when they happen upon a good review. They are casual theater-goers who will risk a mixed review if it has the show has an interesting hook – an artist they like, a very familiar title, or a last minute purchase

     

    Type: Event Lovers (if there is a star, a limited run, a British import – or better yet all three – this group is there)

       

    1. Subtype: Those looking for stars. Reviews or venue doesn’t necessarily matter. If there is a famous person on stage, they are in the audience (and usually at the back stage door). Just think of the advance from Three Days of Rain with Julia Roberts.
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking for a once in a lifetime experience. This group went for the marathon of Coast of Utopia or flock to BAM to see the Royal Shakespeare Company.
    4.  

    5. Subtype: Those looking for a party. Through a gala or benefit and they are there.

     

    Type: Loyalists

       

    1. Subtype: Those looking for a relationship with an institution. The ever-shrinking subscriber population.
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking to see everything a certain artist does. If artist X is in or wrote it, these fans are there.

     

    Type: Knowledge Seekers

       

    1. Subtype: Those looking for an exploration of a subject or time period.
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking for a learning component. This group loves partnership programs – talk-backs, behind the scenes workshops, book clubs, symposiums, related programming from other art-forms, etc.

     

    Type: Tag-a-longs

       

    1. Subtype: Those who were looking to make someone happy. The devoted partner or friend who puts up with a night in the theatre (usually in exchange for something else – a night at the symphony or a baseball game).
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking for a way out. Someone forced them to come. We all have seen these folks. No matter how good the show is they are shifting in their seats and doing a really crappy job of hiding the fact that they are checking their email on the blackberry or I-phone

     

    Type: Gatherers

       

    1. Subtype: Those looking for a large group experience. Whether it is a church group or club, their attendance is based on a gathering of peers.
    2.  

    3. Subtype: Those looking for a social experience. Whether they attend wine-tastings, ladies night, singles nights, young professionals night – you get the gist.

       

    4. Subtype: Those looking for social-standing. These folks want to be seen, be part of the crowd – especially opening night.

     

    Of course a gatherer looking for a social experience might be at the show with a tag-a-long looking for a way out or a loyalist could be looking to be the first one to see a show. There are infinite combinations of these types and subtypes among individuals, pairs or groups. The difficult choice that one must make for each show or season is how to communicate before, during and after a “transaction” with different types and subtypes of audience members and donors. And as with anything in life, you can never please everybody and you may not be able to hit every type on every show.

     

    For example, let’s say a show has a well known artist attached to it perhaps advertising can be either very bold or viral and you can reach several types. But to get those review chasers you will have to use quote ads in the major publications. Every night you will have Tag-a-longs, at least you can make sure they have a pleasant customer experience, so that they aren’t so active in looking for a way out.

     

    We can drill down even further on these types and subtypes and depending on you ability and budget to do niche marketing it can be very useful. No matter what our budget is or what our staff capacity is, we have to get better at have a handful of messages for each show. Unfortunately, many nonprofits have not mastered this as well as the commercial sector. It is common for me to get a subscription brochure and postcard in the mail with the exact same language. That language is usually word for word in all materials from press releases to e-blasts to show posters in the lobby. Of course repetition is good but replication is boring. A little tweaking to specific types can go a long, long way!